Time and again spirited discussions take place on internet fora regarding a study of the status of a number of jyotish parameters, including chara dasha (a signal based cortical period astrofactor) and karakamsha (that the navamsha where the atmakaraka (most advanced planet in longitude) is set. As happens, several of the discussants begun to branch to other negative discussions that really had nothing to do with all the initial questions or issues along with some even became a little resolved and emotional, as additionally often happens on the internet where attention spans of days and weeks have been demanded to be able to get to the bottom of matters and where some times an interest is being discussed on several diverse boards and several topics simultaneously on a particular board! As too is typical, nothing was really resolved, and some of the regulars began expressing their frustrations about such topics coming up again and again and directing visitors to archives . Unfortunately, the ya-hoo forums/fora are those that only limited searching of previous messages will be possible without losing most one's hair, and also the writings sometimes are kept onto yet another yahoo site and this will not help matters when all one wants is to receive a quick overview of what the others are using and when possible their reasons for embracing a certain position! This latter brings forth more gall than good advice even though the intention of the individual posing the question may have been quite commendable and maybe not in any respect confrontational. Knowing Jyotish does not protect one from harbouring Neurotic traits!
Somewhere, over the path of this former quest, yet another issue got endured and began questioning the usage of varga kundalis or even varga chakras, divisional horoscopes that are the center of jyotish and have been used by tropical astrologers at the kind of harmonic graphs. This is something that is utilized in Jyotish going back to almost the first memories of the earliest members at the discussion who finally admitted to such being the situation. I myself, though myself not that senior, have seen horoscopes which were drawn in the century before last where the jyotishi had attracted the rashi chakra and navamsha and dashamsha and therefore forth and much more to the point had commented on these charts in his hearing. kalyan chart So, at the very least many people had been utilizing varga-charts even a couple of hundred decades ago and possibly maybe even prior to those times.
Somewhere during the discussion, in just one of these lists, a number of the members made available a post in which the writer had voiced notions to the contrary, i.e., vargas should not be used at a chart format. A discussion ensued which side stepped the more important and pertinent matter of these technical virtues of using of navamsha varga like a secondary chart. A couple of individuals asked for proofs in classics which indicates that ancient jyotishis advocated of varga chakras. The discussants highlighted that ONLY rashi chakra has to be used and varga placements should only be used for determining the features of planets etc..
This was indeed true and also a positive step forward in the discussion. There were parallel discussions going on which were rehashing the point that BPHS was not original and was not even a classic and published by one or a set of'latterday saints' [my word, not the original poster!] In Jyotish and therefore can't be treated as a timeless. Obviously, there is some support for this could possibly be similarly expected if some one should happen to produce a comment that Jyotish was just a derivative of astrology which the army that was included with Alexander attracted to India. An issue that has been acknowledged to attract even sedate jyotishis on the"war-path!"
To individuals who were interested and intrigued by thisparticular, there looked to be two streams of thought prevailing:
(a) Only Rashi horoscopes should be used. Additional varga kundalis were the merchandise of corrupted comprehension of the classics which themselves many concur may not have lived in pristine shape [while a few of these have thankfully lived in reasonably good shape1]. I don't know just how a lot of the iceberg postulate is established data and just how much is wishful fiction. As stated by the purists with the flow of thought, vargas MUST only be used as measures of qualitative and quantitative strength of planets and also because of that consideration of the deities and primal forces those represent however, perhaps not in the kind of a horoscope and clearly no serious consideration has to be given to aspects along with bhava considerations. Only for clarity, they'd assert, for example, that while the second house lord in navamsha is an important indicator, the simple fact that it is set in the next navamsha varga from the navamsha lagna (essentially in 2 nd house in navamsha chart) is not important. Or, for instance, if Mars is in Aries sign and Libra navamsha, and Saturn is in Gemini sign and Libra navamsha, the two planets are not related (though they would be depicted as being conjoined in the exact same navamsha varga at a navamsha graph ).
(b) Regardless of if specifically described or not, the other flow of believing maintains that varga kundalis have a significant function to play in Jyotish and possibly are of significant utility in discerning chief mandates matters regarding the prescription written by sages. To put it differently, navamsha chart, for example, would hold significant influence within matters of spouse and marriage, while saptamsha graph would be of import from the study of kids in a specific nativity's reading. All these Vargas should be analyzed in a graph format.
There appeared to be a few different people who entirely denied that the veracity of idea flow (b) and a few were a bit taciturn about any of this, perhaps in order to prevent acrimony and becoming ensnared from the controversy. Or there were other motives, known only to them.