Time and spirited discussions take place on internet fora pertaining to an study of the status of a variety of jyotish parameters( such as chara dasha (a signal based cortical period astrofactor) and also karakamsha (that the navamsha in which the atmakaraka (most complex planet in longitude) is set. As characteristically happens, a few of the discussants begun to branch into other negative discussions which really had nothing more to do with the original questions or topics and some actually became a bit exercised and emotional, as also frequently happens on the internet where attention spans of weeks and days have been required inorder to get into the underside of matters and where some times an interest has been discussed on a lot of unique boards and many issues simultaneously on a particular board! As too is average, nothing was resolved, and some of the regulars began expressing their frustrations about those topics coming again and again again and again directing people to archives etc.. Alas, the ya-hoo forums/fora are those that just limited hunting of previous messages is possible without losing all of one's hair, and also the writings are often kept on another yahoo site therefore this does not help things when everybody wants is to find a quick summary of what others are already using and when possible their good reasons for embracing a certain location! This latter brings forth more gall than good advice though the intention of the person posing the question may have been very commendable and not in any way confrontational.
Somewhere, across the path with the former quest, still another issue got born and began questioning the usage of varga kundalis or even varga chakras, divisional horoscopes which are the center of jyotish and have been used by tropical astrologers at the form of harmonic charts. This is something which is utilized in Jyotish going straight back to almost the very first memories of even the oldest members at the forum who eventually admitted to this type of case. I myself, even though myself perhaps not that senior, have experienced horoscopes that were attracted in the century before last where the jyotishi had attracted the rashi chakra and navamsha along with dashamsha and so forth and more importantly had commented on these graphs in his own reading. kalyan panel chart Therefore, at least many people had been utilizing varga-charts a handful of 100 decades ago and conceivably perhaps even ahead of those times.
Somewhere through the discussion, in one of those lists, one of those members made available an article in which the author had expressed thoughts to the contrary, i.e., vargas must not be utilised at a chart format. A conversation ensued which sidestepped the important and pertinent matter of the practical merits of using of navamsha varga being an second graph. A couple of individuals requested for accusations in classics which indicates that ancient jyotishis urged of varga chakras. The discussants highlighted that ONLY rashi chakra has to be properly used and varga placements should only be useful for ascertaining the features of planets .
One of the associates attracted on all astrologers' attention that Parashara had described very plainly just how to find out bhavas from the rashi graph (ascendant, 10th dwelling and trisection of those arcs, etc. in Chapter V of BPHS). This was really true and also a positive step ahead of the discussion. There were also parallel discussions going on which were rehashing the point that BPHS wasn't original and was perhaps not a good classic and compiled by one or a set of'latterday saints' [my word, not the first poster's!] In Jyotish and therefore cannot be treated as a timeless. Apparently, there was some support for this as could be similarly expected if some one were to make a comment that Jyotish had been just a derivative of astrology that the army that came with Alexander brought to India. An issue that's been acknowledged to attract even sedate jyotishis on the"warpath!"
To individuals who were still interested and intrigued by thisparticular, there looked to be two streams of thought prevailing:
(a) Only Rashi horoscopes ought to be properly used. Other varga kundalis were the product of corrupt understanding of the classics which themselves many concur might not have survived in pure form [while a number of these have thankfully lived in pretty great shape1]. Underlying that is the belief some could harbor this, alike the iceberg, available Jyotish is just 1/10th of their complete body as the underwater 9/10th is mostly lost and partly hidden in the secret chambers of paramparas and some of the secret records that you can get nevertheless jealously guarded by the custodian families. I don't know how much of the iceberg postulate is based facts and how much is wishful fiction. According to the purists with the flow of thought, vargas MUST simply be used as measures of qualitative and quantitative strength of planets and also for your consideration of these deities and primal forces those represent BUT perhaps not in the kind of a horoscope and clearly no significant consideration must be directed at aspects along with bhava considerations. Just for clarity, they'd assert, for instance, that as the 2 nd house lord at navamsha is a significant indicator, the fact that it is set in the second navamsha varga from the navamsha lagna (essentially in second dwelling in navamsha graph ) isn't significant.
(b) Regardless of whether explicitly described or not, the other stream of thinking asserts that varga kundalis have a significant role to play in Jyotish and potentially are of significant utility in identifying primary mandates matters regarding the prescription written by sages. To put it differently, navamsha chart, for example, would hold significant influence over matters of marriage and spouse, while saptamsha graph are of similar import from the examination of children in a specific nativity's reading. These Vargas ought to be analyzed in a graph format.
There seemed to be a few different people who entirely denied the veracity of idea flow (b) and also a few were a bit taciturn about any of this, perhaps in order to prevent acrimony and becoming ensnared from the controversy. Or perhaps there were several other motives, known only to them.